step 1. This might be a standardized device that allows behavioral/emotional trouble to get analyzed, considering descriptions. The brand new list for boy behavior included in this research was good 112-product survey to get responded from the teenagers on their own. It is designed to identify syndromes out of issues that often exists together with her. The brand new names of your own seven syndromes are thought temporary meanings out of things spanning him or her unlike symptomatic names. Desk step one shows the latest syndromes in addition to their particular habits.
For the a moment analysis, the fresh chi square take to was applied to analyze the fresh new reliance otherwise independence anywhere between sociodemographic details (gender and you can decades) and you will syndromes (come across desk 3)
dos. Survey towards points connected with behavior trouble and you will migration. So it software include an intro-explanation to get the individual responding the questionnaire. The initial area contains concerns in regards to the general information about brand new informant because the next consisted of 16 unlock and you can closed concerns classified on the about three size: university ecosystem, family relations and you can migration.
Both instruments (the brand new Achenbach questionnaire additionally the questionnaire for the issues connected with condition habits and you may migration) were applied to every of one’s players within their universities.
The data indicated that % of your own pupil society attending college or university in the city out-of Xalapa was young people, that or both of whose parents was in fact migrants in the Joined States. Of them, during the 65 % the father was a great migrant, accompanied by the caretaker (several %) and low percentage, several (2 %) and you will 20% did not answer. They certainly were and additionally inquired about how they noticed regarding father’s lack, that forty % responded which https://datingranking.net/casual-sex/ they thought bad; 30 percent said that it experienced a and just four per cent asserted that they were indifferent.
Concerning your choices troubles claimed from the teenagers by themselves, full, 59.nine percent can be said to get from inside the typical variety, 16 percent during the an effective borderline range (away from standard without having to be health-related), when you find yourself 24.1 percent of your own participants was basically found when you look at the clinical diversity. Additionally, desk dos shows the brand new disorder when considering the group. The latest syndrome towards higher fee-regarding the logical variety-is competitive decisions both in teams.
A statistically factor try present in regards to gender and you may certain syndromes, as the men in the clinical range keeps a greater percentage of behavior for example introversion, somatization, competitive behavior and you may code-cracking, while a high portion of women fall for the systematic assortment out-of attract troubles
So it shopping for corroborates just what education for example those individuals by the Farrington (1989), Trianes (2000), Tattum and you can Way (1989), Whitney and Smith (1993) let you know out of aggressive conclusion from inside the age groups, that’s understandable considering the stage out-of transition where youth is situated, described as behaviors eg disobedience, being demanding, rebelliousness, and others, that will getting an issue of adaptation in the an after decades.
There are mathematically extreme differences when considering the children of non-migrant and you can migrant moms and dads, since second has a higher payment about scientific range inside the behaviors such as for instance stress, somatization, public dilemmas, interest dilemmas, competitive conclusion and you can signal-breaking (discover dining table 2). They feel silent, unsociable plus don’t engage in group affairs.
In relation to age and syndromes, the ? 2 test shows a difference in introversion syndromes (? 2 = , gl = 10, p < .05) social problems (? 2 = , gl = 10, p < .05) thought problems (? 2 = , gl = 10,p < .05), attention problems (? 2 = , gl = 10, p < .05) and aggressive behavior (? 2 = , gl = 10, p < .05), showing that young adults (between 16 and 18) have higher percentages in the clinical range of these syndromes.